Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:25:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:25:31 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:2345 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:23:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:23:17 -0500 From: Pete Zaitcev Message-Id: <200112192023.fBJKNHn09269@devserv.devel.redhat.com> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: aio In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To:

<20011219135708.A12608@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > It's AIO we're talking about, right? AIO is interesting to quite a few > > > > people. I'd read the thread. I'd also read any background material > > > > that Ben would be so kind as to supply. > > > > > > Case closed. > > > > > > Dan didn't even _know_ of the patches. > I've got a fairly recent version of the patch too, it's a little too long to > just sit down and read, to reverse-engineer the above information. Heh, I agree, in a way. I did that once, did not find any major objections and documented about 20 small things like functions that have extra arguments which are never used, etc. Ben saw it and said "I know about all that, never mind". Perhaps I should have had posted it somewhere? -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/