Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Complaints-To: abuse@cubewerk.de
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
        kernel <kernel@dh-electronics.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
Thread-Topic: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
Thread-Index: AQHZtWtRfWVqFQFEA06/3ZItgT3fA6+3fyIAgAA0IHCAABAkAIABu/qQ
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:03:28 +0000
Message-ID: <c9759811145747f98462388f63358dd6@dh-electronics.com>
References: <20230713090328.3879-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
 <d8f60e51-2d62-4370-9032-51eda744239d@sirena.org.uk>
 <9629970cc2c3452e83a43660823319e5@dh-electronics.com>
 <8558f2aa-09fd-4cd3-ae1e-c80893e00aa1@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8558f2aa-09fd-4cd3-ae1e-c80893e00aa1@sirena.org.uk>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@kernel.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 6:34 PM
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 03:36:38PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@kernel.org]
>=20
>>> Are there any dependencies for this patch?  The fact that I acked it
>>> makes me think there were MFD parts
>=20
>> It's a patch series. This patch is the last one in this series, that is
>> missing to have the ability to run the DA9061/62 without a connected IRQ
>> pin. The other patches are already upstreamed and yes there are MFD part=
s,
>> see below:
>=20
> Oh, dear.  Why weren't they applied, it's not even the confusion there
> was over what Reviewed-by means...
>=20
>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082246.GuLdPL0t-lkp@=
intel.com/
>=20
>>> I really doubt that the LKP bot ran into an issue due to a system with
>>> this device without an IRQ wired up...
>=20
>> In V3 of this patch the kernel test robot found an issue. I had really
>> overlooked that. Thanks to LKP. I forgot to replace the irq variable in
>> the function devm_request_threaded_irq(). So it affected the path with
>> IRQ. In V4 I fixed that. In V5 I only rebased it on the current next
>> 20230713 and add Marek's Reviewed-by tag.
>=20
> That doesn't mean you should include tags like this, it makes it look
> like they reported the commit...

Thanks for helping me. May I asked which tags are you referring to here?

Regards
Christoph