Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 21:20:32 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
        kernel <kernel@dh-electronics.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
Message-ID: <5f79c2c7-315b-409d-9f3d-78c1fb03bb49@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20230713090328.3879-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
 <d8f60e51-2d62-4370-9032-51eda744239d@sirena.org.uk>
 <9629970cc2c3452e83a43660823319e5@dh-electronics.com>
 <8558f2aa-09fd-4cd3-ae1e-c80893e00aa1@sirena.org.uk>
 <c9759811145747f98462388f63358dd6@dh-electronics.com>
 <d80b10d3-7c4a-4430-8467-4672e3824a04@sirena.org.uk>
 <d7718a5bb2384bdd96a2cc612ae3640a@dh-electronics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="A/ETv++GvGjCK9O7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d7718a5bb2384bdd96a2cc612ae3640a@dh-electronics.com>
Precedence: bulk


--A/ETv++GvGjCK9O7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:15:40PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 07:03:28PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:

> > The ones quoted above.

> The kernel test robot wrote:
> [...]
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082246.GuLdPL0t-lkp@intel.com/
> [...]

> Maybe that misled me.

Yes, I wish it wouldn't do that.  That really only applies when you're
sending a patch that's substantially a fix for the issue it reports, for
things that have not yet been applied it's just a normal review comment
and you shouldn't add the tags.

--A/ETv++GvGjCK9O7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmSxrg8ACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9BY3Af/W+v9gXYQG0aqgNWDl5aQ0Tw1NjfpyagKdMCIsvOsAo2e1HE18c/+NFBX
G9mn8Ra/k0/qcHrJKlxp+0x5941U1VHfkx/YNSVsTobf/QtHt/VowLlwESyl4weG
n8SJigq1Vsj61AKRzKRA+gYP6pLR5kdlG5jcpCH/65jwOI4iumujGCVFSoWSSxUw
HJJMgfsX+eK0UAxEcj/Qwz1OAWtqHAf7eNFeTdYliLqdOGvhczTXpqxqnpgWImfE
tLD369vAdBbXk6Sj7Vb+gAMo2dRPI9pnTHIuVkVrsyVRzlbaUJREGfTILhsB0YXA
JEMaKO41XrIfQHiCKUhFGyZ4ADUHvA==
=72Oe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--A/ETv++GvGjCK9O7--