Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230622074520.3058027-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230622074520.3058027-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jul 2023 09:44:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYOMtAyCCvv-t0tF6ztNnCdw6gGLOZskmD3QX4_3jyURA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc/genalloc: Name subpools by of_node_full_name()
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Greg, could you apply this patch for fixes?

Thanks!

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 9:45=E2=80=AFAM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro=
.org> wrote:

> A previous commit tried to come up with more generic subpool
> names, but this isn't quite working: the node name was used
> elsewhere to match pools to consumers which regressed the
> nVidia Tegra 2/3 video decoder.
>
> Revert back to an earlier approach using of_node_full_name()
> instead of just the name to make sure the pool name is more
> unique, and change both sites using this in the kernel.
>
> It is not perfect since two SRAM nodes could have the same
> subpool name but it makes the situation better than before.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 21e5a2d10c8f ("misc: sram: Generate unique names for subpools")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij