Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758654AbXJYNvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:51:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754669AbXJYNvi (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:51:38 -0400 Received: from smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net ([62.4.16.104]:52853 "EHLO kraid.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754621AbXJYNvh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:51:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Andrew Morton Cc: trenn@suse.de, linux-acpi , linux-kernel , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources Message-ID: <20071025155135.019baca3@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1193236319.4590.225.camel@queen.suse.de> <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.5 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1445 Lines: 31 On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with > > this patch set things do not apply cleanly. > > > > Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree > > they should end up before doing work for nothing. > > If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell > > me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch > > or whatever other tree. > > If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and > > I can rebase them against this one. > > I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon > patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree. > > This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can > send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good. Thanks for picking these patches, having them in -mm for some time is exactly what we need. Let's see how many systems are affected by the resource conflicts and how we can fix them -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/