Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: confusing changes in the documentation table of contents
In-Reply-To: <CADDUTFyArtN--_27xLWpqnBM2e_udmL+E6Ka7KgimTUOguWthg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADDUTFyArtN--_27xLWpqnBM2e_udmL+E6Ka7KgimTUOguWthg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:47:14 -0600
Message-ID: <87ilaiwsyl.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> In https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.2/ Table of Contents consisted
> of 10 items. It was compact, organized and observable:
>
> The Linux Kernel documentation
> - Working with the development community
> - Internal API manuals
> - Development tools and processes
> - User-oriented documentation
> - Firmware-related documentation
> - Architecture-specific documentation
> - Other documentation
> - Translations
> Indices and tables
>
> Since  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.3/ it consists of 60+ items.
> Now it is long, unorganized and unobservable:

By "table of contents" you're talking about the left column?  That was
done after I got a bunch of complaints about the alabaster sidebar.  I
agree it's still far from ideal.

jon