Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 06:13:09 +0200
From:   Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf
Message-ID: <boris.20230718060325@codesynthesis.com>
References: <boris.20230717111132@codesynthesis.com>
 <CAK7LNATAYqG+Y-XubnU9EJqc3R9QhWCn1nfiGMLU63W7k0vpxQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATAYqG+Y-XubnU9EJqc3R9QhWCn1nfiGMLU63W7k0vpxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Code Synthesis
Precedence: bulk

Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> writes:

> I like 1 or 2, depending on the size of #if soup.

Looks like it won't be too dense if we are willing to only care about
the latest version of Qt5 (i.e., 5.15.0 or later) since most of the
changes appear to also work in the latest Qt5 (they may also work in
earlier versions, but I don't have easy access to those to check).

Should we go with support for "latest Qt5" and Qt6?