Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <06b4d3a2-7629-310f-fea5-4c21429dc2f8@tessares.net>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 10:46:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] selftests: tc: increase timeout and add missing
 kconfig
Content-Language: en-GB
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
        Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230713-tc-selftests-lkft-v1-0-1eb4fd3a96e7@tessares.net>
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
In-Reply-To: <20230713-tc-selftests-lkft-v1-0-1eb4fd3a96e7@tessares.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi David, Jakub, Paolo,

On 13/07/2023 23:16, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> When looking for something else in LKFT reports [1], I noticed that the
> TC selftest ended with a timeout error:
> 
>   not ok 1 selftests: tc-testing: tdc.sh # TIMEOUT 45 seconds
> 
> I also noticed most of the tests were skipped because the "teardown
> stage" did not complete successfully. It was due to missing kconfig.
> 
> These patches fix these two errors plus an extra one because this
> selftest reads info from "/proc/net/nf_conntrack". Thank you Pedro for
> having helped me fixing these issues [2].

It looks like this series is marked as "Changes Requested" on Patchwork
[1] but I think that's a mistake. There was one discussion on-going on
the first patch but it looks like the proposed version is OK.

I didn't see any instructions to pw-bot and nothing on the website [2].

Do you prefer if I re-send it?

Cheers,
Matt

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=765455&state=*
[2] https://patchwork.hopto.org/pw-bot.html
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net