Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:37:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:37:19 -0500 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:52997 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:37:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3C213270.966DABFE@zip.com.au> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:36:00 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17-pre8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise CC: "David S. Miller" , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: aio In-Reply-To:

<20011219135708.A12608@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20011219.161359.71089731.davem@redhat.com>, <20011219.161359.71089731.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:13:59PM -0800 <20011219192136.F2034@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > All I need is a set of syscall numbers that aren't going to change > should this implementation stand up to the test of time. The aio_* functions are part of POSIX and SUS, so merely reserving system call numbers for them does not seems a completely dumb thing to do, IMO. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/