Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 16:25:06 +0200
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] s390: add pte_free_defer() for pgtables
 sharing page
Message-ID: <20230719162506.235856eb@p-imbrenda>
In-Reply-To: <94eccf5f-264c-8abe-4567-e77f4b4e14a@google.com>
References: <7cd843a9-aa80-14f-5eb2-33427363c20@google.com>
        <94eccf5f-264c-8abe-4567-e77f4b4e14a@google.com>
Organization: IBM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:

[...]

> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +void pte_free_defer(struct mm_struct *mm, pgtable_t pgtable)
> +{
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	page = virt_to_page(pgtable);
> +	SetPageActive(page);
> +	page_table_free(mm, (unsigned long *)pgtable);
> +	/*
> +	 * page_table_free() does not do the pgste gmap_unlink() which
> +	 * page_table_free_rcu() does: warn us if pgste ever reaches here.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(mm_alloc_pgste(mm));

it seems I have overlooked something when we previously discussed
this...

mm_alloc_pgste() is true for all processes that have PGSTEs, not only
for processes that can run guests.

There are two ways to enable PGSTEs: an ELF header bit, and a sysctl
knob.

The ELF bit is only used by qemu, it enables PGSTE allocation only for
that single process. This is a strong indication that the process wants
to run guests.

The sysctl knob enables PGSTE allocation for every process in the system
from that moment on. In that case, the WARN_ON_ONCE would be triggered
when not necessary.

There is however another way to check if a process is actually
__using__ the PGSTEs, a.k.a. if the process is actually capable of
running guests.

Confusingly, the name of that function is mm_has_pgste(). This confused
me as well, which is why I didn't notice it when we discussed this
previously :)


in short: can you please use mm_has_pgste() instead of mm_alloc_pgste()
in the WARN_ON_ONCE ?

> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +
>  /*
>   * Base infrastructure required to generate basic asces, region, segment,
>   * and page tables that do not make use of enhanced features like EDAT1.