Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:15:22 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To:     Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
        linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] bpf/btf: tracing: Move finding func-proto API
 and getting func-param API to BTF
Message-Id: <20230720001522.4aaadaf77d037ccdc7e4b83e@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAErzpmtJF4tjHCyYdHgiX_-vp39tdc=3iNmMhQ6SnFVicqZWrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <168960739768.34107.15145201749042174448.stgit@devnote2>
        <168960741686.34107.6330273416064011062.stgit@devnote2>
        <CAErzpmuvhrj0HhTpH2m-C-=pFV=Q_mxYC59Hw=dm0pqUvtPm0g@mail.gmail.com>
        <20230718194431.5653b1e89841e6abd9742ede@kernel.org>
        <20230718225606.926222723cdd8c2c37294e41@kernel.org>
        <CAADnVQ+8PuT5tC4q1spefzzCZG9r1UszFv0jenK5+Ed+QNqtsw@mail.gmail.com>
        <20230719080337.0955a6e77d799daad4c44350@kernel.org>
        <CAErzpmtJF4tjHCyYdHgiX_-vp39tdc=3iNmMhQ6SnFVicqZWrg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:09:48 +0800
Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 7:03 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 10:11:01 -0700
> > Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 6:56 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:44:31 +0900
> > > > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > >  static const struct btf_param *find_btf_func_param(const char *funcname, s32 *nr,
> > > > > > >                                                    bool tracepoint)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > +       struct btf *btf = traceprobe_get_btf();
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I found that traceprobe_get_btf() only returns the vmlinux's btf. But
> > > > > > if the function is
> > > > > > defined in a kernel module, we should get the module's btf.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Good catch! That should be a separated fix (or improvement?)
> > > > > I think it's better to use btf_get() and btf_put(), and pass btf via
> > > > > traceprobe_parse_context.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, it seems that there is no exposed API to get the module's btf.
> > > > Should I use btf_idr and btf_idr_lock directly to find the corresponding
> > > > btf? If there isn't yet, I will add it too.
> > >
> > > There is bpf_find_btf_id.
> > > Probably drop 'static' from it and use it.
> >
> > Thanks! BTW, that API seems to search BTF type info by name. If user want to
> > specify a module name, do we need a new API? (Or expand the function to parse
> > a module name in given name?)
> 
> btf_get_module_btf can be used to get a module's btf, but we have to use
> find_module to get the module by its name firstly.

Thanks for the info! OK, this will be useful.

> 
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>