Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <711f74d6-fe15-6bd4-a9b9-c4f178d95bf3@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 18:55:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 01/29] KVM: Wrap kvm_gfn_range.pte in a per-action
 union
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
        Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
        Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
        Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
        Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <20230718234512.1690985-1-seanjc@google.com>
 <20230718234512.1690985-2-seanjc@google.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230718234512.1690985-2-seanjc@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/19/23 01:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(gfn_range.arg) != sizeof(gfn_range.arg.raw));
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(range->arg) != sizeof(range->arg.raw));

I think these should be static assertions near the definition of the 
structs.  However another possibility is to remove 'raw' and just assign 
the whole union.

Apart from this,

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Paolo

> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(gfn_range.arg) != sizeof(range->arg));