Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:20:36 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc:     Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 6/6] rcu: Use WRITE_ONCE() for assignments to ->next
 for rculist_nulls
Message-ID: <50bc6e0d-7d9b-4634-999a-2ee8f503e86a@paulmck-laptop>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <6127192c-da9b-4599-9738-6e8f92e6c75c@paulmck-laptop>
 <20230717180317.1097590-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
 <9651c3b4-0791-5cd7-567f-f65d28bc8fae@joelfernandes.org>
 <BE64BF3F-69AD-4522-965E-0B7E4054D737@gmail.com>
 <3f6b04b3-af22-49f0-8d3c-269640f9f762@paulmck-laptop>
 <449d0d48-ac98-659b-4d03-e75c318605d4@joelfernandes.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <449d0d48-ac98-659b-4d03-e75c318605d4@joelfernandes.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:48:59PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/18/23 14:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 10:48:07PM +0800, Alan Huang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 2023年7月18日 21:49，Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> 写道：
> > > > 
> > > > On 7/17/23 14:03, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > From: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com>
> > > > > When the objects managed by rculist_nulls are allocated with
> > > > > SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, old readers may still hold references to an object
> > > > > even though it is just now being added, which means the modification of
> > > > > ->next is visible to readers.  This patch therefore uses WRITE_ONCE()
> > > > > for assignments to ->next.
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Did we ever conclude that the READ_ONCE() counterparts were not needed? ;-)
> > > 
> > > Read-side is already protected by rcu_dereference_raw() in hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_{rcu, safe}.
> > 
> > It turns out that different traversal synchronization designs want
> > different pointers using WRITE_ONCE().
> 
> Thank you Alan and Paul,
> 
> Btw, I don't see any users of hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless(), maybe it can
> be removed?

Either that or the people who removed uses injected bugs...

But if this one really does go away, do we need ->pprev to be
protected by _ONCE()?

							Thanx, Paul