Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7058:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id 24csp9322722rwp; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 03:12:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGK3annkreYGkk7LcrkeUSdQV2tIzfCk4EgaZn5oTSF9VGPpI2J4gZQ9k5a4lG6kgDKB2qw X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:12ee:b0:348:7ace:d2dc with SMTP id l14-20020a056e0212ee00b003487aced2dcmr5982694iln.20.1689847949245; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 03:12:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1689847949; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BE37dwqUD2k1IzqdYhffdG0XRzZSHaPfUzV9JcX6+ETYA5NJ8XecgibVBt4wNzumtQ T9rK000qp5qHW7lljz/QKPXburinS8ZCFON9GQgx4vh0tL/856FDnahPukcraCpkjAiC /D58L6nARFsu/BNwE5OeaQBFsCo7vt9WZJS4Ck3RuB0wz3tK3FO6srjCy5+T96/cx63m YrpTr6RoDyrw4UqX6thh3PAbvq7SCl+OD8kYujmpEHhbASpm8eNHd1UzDLMyfutE4plr W/TyBu5e6Dt0mb+e9MVG63HN2qLcWf4h9GeKpo8ccOrMjwZuGcJqNBUZLfNHTJvOnkIW tOIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=sHzbbuCMHfXitdRlhu6CbOu8h6g1SgL0u67GCVg312E=; fh=qg9jAqWCDK6FHH64OpSlOmB6urmwint65ruQTTgpSkM=; b=bzbhr3lGR88nHrhlxeu6ZuZo8gJ8kNRWE1jYs3zWDPYr6rWGOP6DoZSQwJBQR787JF OIxG6+nDCLWAN57HB5V6IUzSg06dWwPp4OX8WllIL4ggZajdUb5JgULnbtAzM+M0WSSX /bRGwk9Qoh9xEUvoTF8G3FfdE6kURtDXQZUcx8WhB+biEL8C1obMBF+Ug4w1kiWnFXw6 8vVV+QK7jhB0iEZnPHJkHd1oLj+f8ZIjRN8Ub+javLesgvyxBgCEZWqNNllWRLZIpVg9 9tQddz97TzWls7LFelY+ZqMpvZu1YkdvM204BPXDO2j63cuZx29w6VKOBfah2k69RoAB Kwng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=EH0tPb84; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e10-20020a63744a000000b0055b6a7a2ab7si486949pgn.573.2023.07.20.03.12.16; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 03:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=EH0tPb84; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230459AbjGTJ6O (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:58:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231401AbjGTJ6E (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:58:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A80EE for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 02:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5D022B4E; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:58:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1689847082; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sHzbbuCMHfXitdRlhu6CbOu8h6g1SgL0u67GCVg312E=; b=EH0tPb84wa+gVtdOZdXgNL5NQIPNb66mpUXoBRWwL6GOYaDmeJ73oNfl7Vnc1UGIKuDYCW 87auuZNyKIItvtaFxRyTxVFb9V2A0cDPsjNUH+dPBwogyQ/fyByenD1Gkhd0VeKEdK1SLq b2m93e0Sc4zkgddM/cqJkfjnAZLNqGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1689847082; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sHzbbuCMHfXitdRlhu6CbOu8h6g1SgL0u67GCVg312E=; b=jS4/SYMM25FVLJF4c4U12FGyRKwC3mQUVQ0Cl7iLBI28ToDyEnpBbAJQAtXLSUXA72pVfp CfMX2sjLjxRp2LDQ== Received: from suse.de (unknown [10.163.43.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AFCF2C143; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:57:57 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, Jiri Bohac Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value Message-ID: <20230720095757.syyntxzoqgiucxng@suse.de> References: <20230719103743.4775-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20230719103743.4775-2-chrubis@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230719103743.4775-2-chrubis@suse.cz> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Thre is 10% rounding error in the intial value of the > sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y. > > This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01: > > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90 > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns > sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90 > > What this test does is to compare the return value from the > sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and > fails if they do not match. > > The prolem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as: > > static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE; > > which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it > introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300: > > (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000) > > (1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000) > > 3 * 30 = 90 > > This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication > and division. After this fix we get: > > (MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ > > (1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300 > > (1000 * 30) / 300 = 100 > > Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis > CC: Jiri Bohac Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs