Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Hu Haowen <src.res.211@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/6] docs/zh_TW: update zh_TW's documentation
 from an ascensive aspect
In-Reply-To: <671503c8-c5c9-f475-1085-2a5c551d74ea@gmail.com>
References: <20230720132729.1821-1-src.res.211@gmail.com>
 <877cqur8l6.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <671503c8-c5c9-f475-1085-2a5c551d74ea@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:51:07 -0600
Message-ID: <87h6pypono.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Hu Haowen <src.res.211@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2023/7/20 21:55, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Hu Haowen <src.res.211@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Update zh_TW's documentation concentrating on the following aspects:
>>>
>>>      * The file tree structure changes of the main documentation;
>>>      * Some changes and ideas from zh_CN translation;
>>>      * Removal for several obsoleted contents within the zh_TW translation
>>>        or those which are not exising anymore in the main documentation.
>>>      * Replacements for some incorrect words and phrases in traditional
>>>        Chinese or those which are odd within their context being hard for
>>>        readers to comprehend.
>> 
>> Is there a reason why you're resending a patch series from four days
>> ago?
>
> Considering for a long time but no reply, I just thought my patches were
> ignored among the flood of emails or regarded as spam information.
>
> Accordingly I resent my patches to ensure the reception of my patches as
> well as added the cover email to provide an outline of my patch series.

Four days is not long enough by far; I'll get to it.

Thanks,

jon