Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:59:41 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>, corbet@lwn.net,
        m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, kim.phillips@amd.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
Message-Id: <20230720095941.76803bbda5ad0c5103713d0c@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230720115408.GA13114@lst.de>
References: <20230720082517.GA7057@lst.de>
        <20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
        <25942dafbc7f52488a30c807b6322109539442cf@linux.dev>
        <20230720115408.GA13114@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:08 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:47:37AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:
> > It's based on linux-next tree.
> > 
> > This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
> > a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures").
> 
> Where did this land?  dma patches really should be going through
> the DMA tree..

It's in mm-unstable with a note "hch" :)

I'll drop it.