Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230712-pinctrl-sunxi-boudns-v1-1-85f37de79b9f@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230712-pinctrl-sunxi-boudns-v1-1-85f37de79b9f@kernel.org>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:33:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb6P1KjGWNnYWKoG+ZxFCLo7_06zjv_8CGMFoT9S44o1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Add some defensiveness for regulators array
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 7:20=E2=80=AFPM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wro=
te:

> The sunxi pinctrl has a fixed size array it uses to store regulators used
> in the driver. There is currently nothing that ensures that the number of
> elements in the array is large enough to map the regulators defined by th=
e
> individual SoCs. While this is currently the case having an explicit chec=
k
> in there will make life easier for anyone debugging memory issues that
> manifest in the driver so let's add one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij