Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <boris.20230717111132@codesynthesis.com> <CAK7LNATAYqG+Y-XubnU9EJqc3R9QhWCn1nfiGMLU63W7k0vpxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <boris.20230718060325@codesynthesis.com>
In-Reply-To: <boris.20230718060325@codesynthesis.com>
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:37:32 +0900
Message-ID: <CAK7LNARt3do8BR2eUp4JscgCwsHy9Kz=KHHnAvrB7v7yO1FJrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf
To:     Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 1:12=E2=80=AFPM Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesi=
s.com> wrote:
>
> Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > I like 1 or 2, depending on the size of #if soup.
>
> Looks like it won't be too dense if we are willing to only care about
> the latest version of Qt5 (i.e., 5.15.0 or later) since most of the
> changes appear to also work in the latest Qt5 (they may also work in
> earlier versions, but I don't have easy access to those to check).
>
> Should we go with support for "latest Qt5" and Qt6?


Yeah, I think so.


--=20
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada