Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <acb25476-f5d1-3dfd-8e76-1a582b63dada@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:14:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/38] minmax: Add in_range() macro
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230710204339.3554919-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20230710204339.3554919-2-willy@infradead.org>
From:   Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230710204339.3554919-2-willy@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/07/2023 21:43, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Determine if a value lies within a range more efficiently (subtraction +
> comparison vs two comparisons and an AND).  It also has useful (under
> some circumstances) behaviour if the range exceeds the maximum value of
> the type.

Sorry it's taken me a while to looking at this.

I'm getting a lot of warnings about in_range() being redefined when building
arm64 (defconfig-ish) with this patch set on top of v6.5-rc2.

Looks like there are multiple existing implementations.

Thanks,
Ryan