Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        rafael@kernel.org
Cc:     lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
        amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, amit.kachhap@gmail.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
        len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, Pierre.Gondois@arm.com,
        ionela.voinescu@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/12] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:50:19 +0100
Message-Id: <20230721155022.2339982-10-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230721155022.2339982-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
References: <20230721155022.2339982-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The EM is going to support runtime modifications of the power data.
Introduce RCU safe mechanism to clean up the old allocated EM data.
It also adds a mutex for the EM structure to serialize the modifiers.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index c2f8a0046f8a..4596bfe7398e 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
  */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(em_pd_mutex);
 
+static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev,
+					   struct em_perf_state *table);
+
 static bool _is_cpu_device(struct device *dev)
 {
 	return (dev->bus == &cpu_subsys);
@@ -104,6 +107,45 @@ static void em_debug_create_pd(struct device *dev) {}
 static void em_debug_remove_pd(struct device *dev) {}
 #endif
 
+static void em_destroy_rt_table_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
+{
+	struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
+
+	runtime_table = container_of(rp, struct em_perf_table, rcu);
+	kfree(runtime_table->state);
+	kfree(runtime_table);
+}
+
+static void em_destroy_tmp_setup_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
+{
+	struct em_perf_table *runtime_table;
+
+	runtime_table = container_of(rp, struct em_perf_table, rcu);
+	kfree(runtime_table);
+}
+
+static void em_perf_runtime_table_set(struct device *dev,
+				      struct em_perf_table *runtime_table)
+{
+	struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd;
+	struct em_perf_table *tmp;
+
+	tmp = pd->runtime_table;
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(pd->runtime_table, runtime_table);
+
+	em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev, runtime_table->state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check if the 'state' array is not actually the one from setup.
+	 * If it is then don't free it.
+	 */
+	if (tmp->state == pd->default_table->state)
+		call_rcu(&tmp->rcu, em_destroy_tmp_setup_rcu);
+	else
+		call_rcu(&tmp->rcu, em_destroy_rt_table_rcu);
+}
+
 static int em_compute_costs(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table,
 			    struct em_data_callback *cb, int nr_states,
 			    unsigned long flags)
-- 
2.25.1