Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:14:42 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] regmap: Reject fast_io regmap configurations
 with RBTREE and MAPLE caches
Message-ID: <52f21f66-96e3-4ff9-b1bf-625bdc535b42@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20230720032848.1306349-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <20230720032848.1306349-2-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <CGME20230721145342eucas1p12e658a54d36d985b2811e2c21f7810ee@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <c2bba4df-da1f-5666-89aa-28c6700575ca@samsung.com>
 <fe31bb86-40ec-4b77-9edd-eeaa61bb5e08@sirena.org.uk>
 <c9614ffb-7840-6a84-883d-ed4371d75c11@roeck-us.net>
 <205a83df-c67b-457f-a9bf-a9c6def4bb3e@sirena.org.uk>
 <1c90db79-4a1a-d3cb-5250-f30cf6b5a90c@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y5Ora18Azgbblbsy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1c90db79-4a1a-d3cb-5250-f30cf6b5a90c@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk


--y5Ora18Azgbblbsy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:01:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 7/21/23 08:13, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yeah.  You *can* use the dynamically allocating caches safely if you
> > ensure that no new cache nodes are allocated during I/O.  I'd not
> > realised people were actually doing this.

> Ok.

> Dan, let me know if you don't have time to send a proper patch.
> I have one based on your suggestion prepared that I could send out
> if needed.

Dan sent the patch already, assuming my CI doesn't blow up unexpectedly
it should be applied tonight.

--y5Ora18Azgbblbsy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmS6rvEACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DWgwf9HKwgSix/kA8JSz+x3BXLgjXeeYOKuz4Cos8d6oDZbQOQ0pu2wnCk7b4I
+Q7qIjfFkhVeFvJN+vwMtWkKMiU/uOMAqi3PtuRIEsRolK/9i7g85HK1+/pVi6NH
Ec9wDamU7ED9L5y8VxD6JYV6wcCGp7KqX1Z+HuStIllxqcNf1T0AFC7wqR+Mq33P
cmKQMqL+n/dz1mD0S85vt7s0WFS7SDi6wtSqY7nyIiVBlUNxZiPvaej3QMpoi/t/
uNkqjq2i5lvS26SrZ+pN6Gw9fjER9XlBYkXxJUpgNyAlUFbTbbARBBppM8/dhlaP
w/gduGTZTVdSBivpvxmMr31J4tk7lA==
=90DQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y5Ora18Azgbblbsy--