Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:54:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:54:21 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:45328 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:54:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 21:52:41 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Rik van Riel cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Alan Cox , Davide Libenzi , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > The thing is, I'm personally very suspicious of the "features for that > > exclusive 0.1%" mentality. > > Then why do we have sendfile(), or that idiotic sys_readahead() ? Hey, I expect others to do things in their tree, and I live by the same rules: I do my stuff openly in my tree. The Apache people actually seemed quite interested in sendfile. Of course, that was before apache seemed to stop worrying about trying to beat others at performance (rightly or wrongly - I think they are right from a pragmatic viewpoint, and wrong from a PR one). And hey, the same way I encourage others to experiment openly with their trees, I experiment with mine. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/