Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:00:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:00:44 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([12.107.208.154]:49278 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:59:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:59:28 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: "David S. Miller" Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, cs@zip.com.au, billh@tierra.ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: aio Message-ID: <20011220005928.F3682@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20011219.185847.77651573.davem@redhat.com> <20011219.215730.66180642.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011219.215730.66180642.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:57:30PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:57:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Then let us agree to disagree. :-) I think it's potential advantages, > and how many things really "require it" for better performance, is > being blown out of proportion. Show me how to make a single process server that can handle 100000 or more open tcp sockets that doesn't collapse under load. I can do it with aio; can you do it without? -ben -- Fish. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/