Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764739AbXJZU77 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:59:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757408AbXJZU7t (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:59:49 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:37440 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754974AbXJZU7s (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:59:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:55:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [0/3] Distributed storage. Mirror algo extension for automatic recovery. Message-Id: <20071026135538.d22125a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071018191741.GA848@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20071018191741.GA848@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 19 On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:17:41 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > I'm pleased to announce sixth release of the distributed storage > subsystem, which allows to form a storage on top of remote and local > nodes, which in turn can be exported to another storage as a node to > form tree-like storages. I went back and re-read last month's discussion and I'm not seeing any reason why we shouldn't start thinking about merging this. How close is it to that stage? A peek at your development blog indicates that things are still changing at a moderate rate? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/