Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To:     <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC:     <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()
Date:   Sun, 23 Jul 2023 11:25:38 +0800
Message-ID: <20230723032538.3190239-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 058fb748e128..64014b656a0f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -582,9 +582,9 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
 	/*
 	 * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
 	 * We are special casing this specific case here because
-	 * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
-	 * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
-	 * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
+	 * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection calculation is not robust enough
+	 * to keep the protection invariant for calculated effective values
+	 * for parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
 	 * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)
 	 * which would want to have effective values 0 for targeted reclaim
 	 * but a different value for external reclaim.
-- 
2.33.0