Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:50:35 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial
Message-ID: <20071026165035.33383e36@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
In-Reply-To: <4722608E.3000405@garzik.org>
References: <20071019075443.GA6407@havoc.gtf.org>
	<20071019075808.GH6407@havoc.gtf.org>
	<AE4F746F2AECFC4DA4AADD66A1DFEF01F3D54D@otce2k301.adaptec.com>
	<20071026143525.b9218ed7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<4722608E.3000405@garzik.org>
Organization: Intel
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1008
Lines: 33

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:47:58 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That was a goofup.  I proposed that we should add a #define
> > TWO_ARG_IRQ_HANDLERS (or whatever) and I think I actually wrote the
> > patch, but it got lost.
> > 
> > I agree it would be a kind thing to do in this case.

> 
> 
> Yep, I was thinking that including
> 
> 	#define IRQ_HANDLER_V3
> 
> would be a good idea.
>

it sets a certain precedent though.... we don't do this for the 500
other API changes we do each release (see stable-api-nonsense)... so
this one is mostly arbitrary picked out


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/