Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:38:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:38:34 -0500 Received: from svr3.applink.net ([206.50.88.3]:269 "EHLO svr3.applink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:38:14 -0500 Message-Id: <200112200637.fBK6b2Sr014173@svr3.applink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Timothy Covell Reply-To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org To: Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds Subject: Scheduler, Can we save some juice ... Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:33:23 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Alan Cox , Davide Libenzi , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 19 December 2001 21:50, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The thing is, I'm personally very suspicious of the "features for that > > exclusive 0.1%" mentality. > > Then why do we have sendfile(), or that idiotic sys_readahead() ? > > (is there _any_ use for sys_readahead() ? at all ?) > > cheers, > > Rik OK, here's another 0.1% for you. Considering how Linux SMP doesn't have high CPU affinity, would it be possible to make a patch such that the additional CPUs remain in deep sleep/HALT mode until the first CPU hits a high-water mark of say 90% utilization? I've started doing this by hand with the (x)pulse application. My goal is to save electricity and cut down on excess heat when I'm just browsing the web and not compiling or seti@home'ing. -- timothy.covell@ashavan.org. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/