Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:06:30 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: core-api: Drop :export: for
 int_log.h
Message-ID: <ZL/W5rc043oPLfMV@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230725104956.47806-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <87a5vkb0ee.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <b761d010-ef21-4be6-b6c3-678498b7fa71@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b761d010-ef21-4be6-b6c3-678498b7fa71@sirena.org.uk>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:46:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:12:25AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
> 
> > > The :export: keyword makes sense only for C-files, where EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> > > might appear. Otherwise kernel-doc may not produce anything out of this
> > > file.
> 
> > So I still can't take this patch for the reasons described before.  It
> > looks like Mark took the patch that added the problem, so perhaps he
> > should be a recipient of this one too?  I'll add him to the CC...
> 
> Is this the same patch I applied yesterday or a different one?

Hmm...
I do not see anything like this patch in your current ASoC for-next
(nor in for-6.6). Did I look into wrong branch?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko