Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp498960rwb; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFGnUx/Qopfv71BcFxupUW6x86TWS9a66Rrrrx6kRrkQSOfNbRXduy7mIDGbTg//hF8MgUO X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2584:b0:765:a77c:7219 with SMTP id x4-20020a05620a258400b00765a77c7219mr1029774qko.0.1690342583192; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:36:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690342583; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TSKPulsThW02b1dujsfzQMVtDwz7FkybJNDmZSeyeaBZrZfNRHgnSKspSuJWJ0AhGc rYRMLysqFERZT/q48SRyQcEqWPFk7E9aAlZL0iOlfqP8NuSiZ7Th/jPNEGzSM05BTGsh d08EyD9Ui1BCJw8D65fyDlcrvX0GmjNYejEaK36WTJFu9cqmk4Z68b15MoG1fVN+XFIA BJXzE/FiQNPL+vQnUrfCWYD+4W8VpCAIIXAvtH3T/9TrN1ZNgW4mOcu6YY2/XLiVxB2m 4BAlka1XP2mFQhwxU37iGshY8IUUwXiqr9sgzteDzjvs78iHZZwOeNEsraqCBlnDeY4b WVjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=9B1/xTfbRrp+nli6ystlDivery9ALj/JHEMe9k7b0co=; fh=Tri0Tca2WZO3jbPOSzr7CJnuvKqGmx515MJ2/OZDFOY=; b=Wi4Q6TOdN4IUymg9ydhgNECHVnz3uHKN/QgPbKZc+uphbRME4nfGPgA4RimUXCl6lK S+4XZdlmItbzLjNu92O82Kaw4Sa22UUOKf8TWbKpklVVT91zK3/oThFgCxRCULVojAwg K+epiAISlDkfp+8KEP6wVkN2Abk1S+r4rkgXNmX5sCnDrb8ByGB1l6tOzekQP3J5aVr7 QH/wWeN5ZCYPHKovXKAQGygafLebWKmJ880jw0WulO50tdH7yAjVN17Fl2p4ac81kKwH fKwL2d1LPZ5/VNyMJy9tPRYQrS67e5xl06fuBRM1r6QVb50L7+g0Tr6OpdoTYBQM66ll l1cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4-20020a17090a9b8400b0025eae2cef4bsi582117pjp.1.2023.07.25.20.36.11; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230422AbjGZCUG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:20:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229520AbjGZCUE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:20:04 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8771BD6; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4R9cx244ClzLnyK; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:17:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.108.26] (10.67.108.26) by dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:20:01 +0800 Message-ID: <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:20:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Content-Language: en-US To: Conor Dooley CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> From: "chenjiahao (C)" In-Reply-To: <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.108.26] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey, > > Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to > riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? > > Thanks, > Conor. Hi, My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and it seems all ok. Could you try applying with the base above, or is there any problem with that base? Thanks, Jiahao