Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp672978rwb; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFhG3pswieCqdIzHgTNpWLJepDh4WKUT073HtmYCEvXHk7sknEpoLG3LI0RomLCU0HVd1k/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b694:b0:1bb:25bd:d09c with SMTP id c20-20020a170902b69400b001bb25bdd09cmr879926pls.1.1690356521292; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690356521; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DGKkCV0tB1NGT/GlwXQ8+njbgoMZjo4cl34gFx987J+dX9cF0jo60Gq7DrR0X8ip4i sepxEePOL2thIvlfXQ8tNHfEEPvpo/lEU9pN+D6K1ljutUPGV6CWhMqVuJsT1+CFyQRD 7q+ucjDmUVrPDIGDN+xC8wcVJwFA4h7VfUA454Y4sl6TMUE2s2pPX3m4U+rE800J7DkZ mK14VNRxmhmi1CfiYETvDvKCRd5tQMtPFybCaD2/sF1nETLCS/11yltcet+1gfCP8mNM TQvNsuyonHOtyU8AULIdLrCyUHPLXUmNT8TvpJtwueKL3uP9XooZQTYXv5kYzVSmKk1+ 3qeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=gDNCsCsO1KbGhAHJNmEBa1gkvZGzH8c3upBGSOQlNOA=; fh=kJ5d4Rrylp0Q3GyNowTiU0fiTh6vEtmB9R2Vl5uedu0=; b=moaPQ8QMuqGSRLb/21jUCNKSgSr2reI9ngK2goBYZdAXFphQY0+dOO1nRHN7kCJbJ3 IvOCm22ICdnVi68NjILAGhLua+MxdEEYOYLX6m/FLo4YOuvpuYPx7r4n1qQjOwrSGBFt rUkz/WUh2jYZbTdtHor9XKPE4qEgHgIfU6U8xe9CEkaWGTGsrDiv0R+ySwhxnCasRyiG lPWk/pq6bYpcwVLIjyvoNfc/6dgLgVxkB9z0jOpyi+2rmOSjO2ZQxDMoKFf5hOF6IvOM p43SW+c16efTlLGiL6ospm+HiSwHkyrc5gBOqq2zQBH9mRE9MokrYuoxup2N9eMxvDSt LJhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=F62RQVXU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17-20020a170902da9100b001bb8704e6f3si6979774plx.278.2023.07.26.00.28.28; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=F62RQVXU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231927AbjGZGqM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:46:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230313AbjGZGp5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:45:57 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1122705; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1690353953; x=1721889953; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gDNCsCsO1KbGhAHJNmEBa1gkvZGzH8c3upBGSOQlNOA=; b=F62RQVXUzDmoaoFbYR32xfCLGv/rmnK/AVb2eXGLxODDGkPKOLuigRzz EXyNSGQWvtQfpLymX7GHE0WUDyvj3cZYaBY79fgXY7zCJ6boZtMVHWe1V KARVT4ZyAJmD27dXOEUMFcHCFy4IFK2q5VVfNEDqC90IfUfHsXWp3FR46 mxsdYCysbIY93uFMbEI4bk5+JUWtd1lFZq5FW9yDUCdmcvNdjTY591JBl BJwQQXLM/3q1d7cVW83UGVQAlv06reRGGOgQPAUzDwuhHtNSTofFfeLTn em/cIzJtcfeOaGNV7IVLedwSVDpUDpFWxZAMZIfdc/+JtEEcnsSfKK2rn Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,231,1684825200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="163253302" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 25 Jul 2023 23:45:52 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:45 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:45:08 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: "chenjiahao (C)" CC: Conor Dooley , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Message-ID: <20230726-affix-employed-319aada685e7@wendy> References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:20:00AM +0800, chenjiahao (C) wrote: >=20 > On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > > Hey, > >=20 > > Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to > > riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Conor. >=20 > Hi, >=20 > My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD > (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and > it seems all ok. > Could you try applying with the base above, or > is there any problem with that base? There's some difference between linux-next and riscv/for-next that prevents the patchwork automation from applying the patches. --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZMDA5QAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0tKwAP9sgmoHHSgRVm0XXcQYF7qM3+usgvdzT0xxSm4kXVozZgD3WZsTiicAAJla IpwJI7hV57KDX7zRXzg2yr8IZCNjDg== =VfGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9--