Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ace112fe-978c-a518-2be5-3f3d1f7fd29c@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:38:51 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable various configs for TI
 platforms
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
CC:     <vigneshr@ti.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
        <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
        <geert+renesas@glider.be>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>, <rafal@milecki.pl>, <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>,
        Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>,
        MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>,
        Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>,
        Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>
References: <20230726133049.2074105-1-u-kumar1@ti.com>
 <20230726134322.gepflrrdcpx6uxvu@colony>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230726134322.gepflrrdcpx6uxvu@colony>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Thanks Nishanth

On 7/26/2023 7:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> on $subject: I think mentioning K3 will help narrow things down a bit.
>
> On 19:00-20230726, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> Enable TI ECAP, DP83869 driver, TI OMAP2, K3 remote proc
> I think you mean to state TI mailbox and not omap2 :)

Not really :)

This driver TI OMAP2, (CONFIG_OMAP2PLUS_MBOX) is used in

TI K3 platforms as well for communications with remote processors.

Rest comments will address in v3.


>
>> SND_SOC_J721E_EVM, MCAN, UFS and RTI driver to be built
>> as module.
>> These are needed on different TI platforms.
> Please elaborate the list of boards this benefits TI platforms are a
> big variant list. TI Platforms is too generic a term that scales
> architectures.. that is not the point you are trying to make.
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> If the various contributers are ok, just my 2 cents:
> Could you drop all other sign-offs other than yours? I understand the
> contributions from various members on the TI SDK tree, but I'vent seen
> them attempt to upstream and you took the effort in ensuring the new
> squashed patch contains all the relevant components.
>
> [..]