Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:30:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:30:07 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:7942 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:29:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:29:28 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: "David S. Miller" Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... In-Reply-To: <20011219.213956.26276011.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Rik van Riel > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > The thing is, I'm personally very suspicious of the "features for that > > exclusive 0.1%" mentality. > > Then why do we have sendfile(), or that idiotic sys_readahead() ? > > Sending files over sockets are %99 of what most network servers are > actually doing today, it is much more than 0.1% :-) The same could be said for AIO, there are a _lot_ of server programs which are heavily overthreaded because of a lack of AIO... cheers, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/