Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:00:08 +0300
From:   kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
        n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with
 the spec
Message-ID: <20230727130008.jx3olv4pwpdsrui2@box.shutemov.name>
References: <cover.1690369495.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
 <b3f5a25e72094a11add22e1a7c5dda3ea91d0e98.1690369495.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b3f5a25e72094a11add22e1a7c5dda3ea91d0e98.1690369495.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:25:05PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG".  Currently, the kernel
> doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
> prefix "TDX_" for all of them.  Although it's arguable whether the TDX
> spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
> the spec when naming those macros.
> 
> Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec.  As
> a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
> which all have prefix "TDH".
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>

I remember we had few back-and-forth on naming this defines. I think
matching names to the spec is helpful for future readers:

Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov