Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:49:51 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc:     Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, ecree@solarflare.com,
        andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, leon@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net 0/2] rxfh with custom RSS fixes
Message-ID: <20230727084951.1e4d3279@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <f565a8d6-e3b8-96d1-a7ac-212c64c60b1c@gmail.com>
References: <20230723150658.241597-1-jdamato@fastly.com>
        <b52f55ef-f166-cd1a-85b5-5fe32fe5f525@gmail.com>
        <20230724150815.494ae294@kernel.org>
        <f565a8d6-e3b8-96d1-a7ac-212c64c60b1c@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:40:24 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> More generally the status of my RSS work is that I've been umming
>  and ahhing about that mutex you didn't like (I still think it's
>  the Right Thing) so I've not made much progress with it.

I had a look at the code again, and I don't think the mutex is a deal
breaker. More of an aesthetic thing, so to speak. If you strongly
prefer to keep the mutex that's fine.