Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <8ecb57fb-4560-bdfc-9e55-63e3b0937132@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:57:35 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 27 (arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c)
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Anastasia Eskova <anastasia.eskova@ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "open list:S390 ARCHITECTURE" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230727143346.079d4e5a@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230727143346.079d4e5a@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 7/26/23 21:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20230726:
> 

on s390:

gcc-13.1.0-nolibc/s390-linux/bin/s390-linux-ld: arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.o: in function `check_certificate_hash':
arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c:267: undefined reference to `sha256'

so config CERT_STORE should select CRYPTO_SHA256 or CRYPTO_SHA256_S390 ?
or both?

-- 
~Randy