Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:40:24 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To:     Duje =?utf-8?Q?Mihanovi=C4=87?= <duje.mihanovic@skole.hr>
Cc:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        afaerber@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
Message-ID: <ZMKd+CoWu7QjOxHo@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230727162909.6031-1-duje.mihanovic@skole.hr>
 <20230727162909.6031-3-duje.mihanovic@skole.hr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230727162909.6031-3-duje.mihanovic@skole.hr>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 06:29:00PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> Fixes the warning in dmesg that static allocation of the base is
> deprecated.

Right.

> This will break some older PXA boards (such as Spitz) as they still
> seem to rely on fixed GPIO numbers with gpio_request and such.

So...? Why do you think this patch can be accepted?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko