Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757873AbXJ2O32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:29:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754219AbXJ2O3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:29:20 -0400 Received: from twin.jikos.cz ([213.151.79.26]:44269 "EHLO twin.jikos.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752894AbXJ2O3T (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:29:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:28:31 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina To: Alan Stern cc: Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Adrian Bunk , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Sillik , David Brownell , Torsten Kaiser Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 23 On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > You guys all sound confused about this. The original reason writing for > the onetouch driver was because the button on this disk drive isn't an > HID device! That is, the drive doesn't include any of the usual HID > descriptors for the button and the button doesn't send HID-style > reports. The only reason I was talking about it in terms of being a HID device was because Thorsten stated that usbhid driver gets bound to it. Now that we know that Torsten was having different HW, my point is of course invalid :) Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/