Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 20:34:06 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: reset: Use the correct type of sleep/delay
 based on length
Message-ID: <ht25x3d5uer2ygtrphtyxgfp3hdu3wjsywrzo6xw3mhxeda6ya@pbgrbe6tbwui>
References: <20230726-topic-qcom_reset-v2-1-4a6e1b1d0439@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230726-topic-qcom_reset-v2-1-4a6e1b1d0439@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:14:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Based on the length of the delay (see: [1]), use the correct sleep/delay
> functions.

I believe this comment was good in v1, but there's no mentioning of
fsleep() in the referenced document. Now I have read the code and know
better, real nice.

Could you please improve the commit message to make obvious what I had
to look at the code to understand, and to by-pass-educate readers of it?

Thanks,
Bjorn