Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:49:26 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To:     Tree Davies <tdavies@darkphysics.net>
Cc:     Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, anjan@momi.ca, error27@gmail.com,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Function name cleanup series 1
Message-ID: <f47c3d86-aada-470d-8ed8-5d7957edb28a@kadam.mountain>
References: <20230728054742.622297-1-tdavies@darkphysics.net>
 <f4aaf5f5-a6b0-ef10-0d9b-fc52035ca309@gmail.com>
 <ZMNf2d615rXJ8O95@basil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZMNf2d615rXJ8O95@basil>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:27:37PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 08:16:03AM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
> > On 7/28/23 07:47, Tree Davies wrote:
> > > Rename functions to fix checkpatch warning: Avoid CamelCase
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Changelist:
> > > v3: Changed patch #5, Rename global function ResetBaEntry to rtllib_reset_ba_entry
> > > v2: Sent to mailing list via git send-email, patches are the same.
> > > 
> > > Tree Davies (5):
> > >    Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ActivateBAEntry
> > >    Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function DeActivateBAEntry
> > >    Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function TxTsDeleteBA
> > >    Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function RxTsDeleteBA
> > >    Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ResetBaEntry
> > > 
> > >   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 44 +++++++++++------------
> > >   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_TSProc.c |  6 ++--
> > >   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h         |  2 +-
> > >   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > Hi Tree,
> > 
> > those patches have been accepted and cannot be applied again.
> > 
> 
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> Right, patch #5 was not accepted though. Grep asked to fix it up.
> I thought that because it was part of that series I was supposed to
> resend as new version.

But now you understand what to do, right?  Pull the latest code and do
all your work on top of that.  Don't resend the stuff which was applied.

regards,
dan carpenter