Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b5c44fc5-005d-6268-af68-85eda9c330ba@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:06:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add
 microchip,sam9x7-pmecc
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
        miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        conor+dt@kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, claudiu.beznea@microchip.com,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230728102636.266309-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230728102636.266309-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
> 

Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?

> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
>  	"atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
>  	"atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
>  	"microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
> +	"microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
>  - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
>         block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>