Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f7186a62-19a1-5d72-ee1b-255b81fb8abe@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:40:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock
 controller
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@microchip.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230728102350.265520-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230728102350.265520-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml          | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>                - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>                - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
>                - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-pmc
>            - const: syscon

Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the
driver change?

Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems.
With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof