Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp1465709rwb; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlG2SGTfJUIXiogu8NGM4jhAkybyPUdis9mKBk5nbwj/O3W1SmDwasohOk6nkZtorFu4FPnR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:194b:b0:677:c5bf:dccc with SMTP id s11-20020a056a00194b00b00677c5bfdcccmr2302260pfk.19.1690562725055; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690562725; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FJ9PGJnF57F7z6206rILiAJmWazyofMdUw/yPbW8AiSlE84ndYZD+DrCufgTr1dPsr +ej+ARCBFIc1jt1JqD8s+lB2hQtj2zHZF3utQa/oHpMrVvh6idPONq8UP19DTDL7bkYT 3+awHYC7ovgDcxMeJOkaY4LjdhqoCQJkkaqz0EcfQoGbzncWftrfHVX9lNPB+BZIqixq +eJO6TP4vwcmuVkbkmnH1U5gk+OYD4sJw6rkHRw/opTseT+RAvhZ3PiCFaxFGbHN1s1q XxZIEi/IlyDVpfvBB+zUNQBDzxVQegfgCsfgzYkrEpyCs7FVllz9/W5k1gS/ENIqTOd/ R/Lw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=k865hQuZM2PRlELf9TrViGc1EuOiJHBsgWnsGRS2HoE=; fh=p8J5/iwFwopkJ0Tehqk9lE2O9HMKAB585TUy8qg9JXY=; b=s+1l6xK1xMnUxPbDIOgHgxEgoOW/tpMqW+yr2AJSAQhWbuxbOetzAwYVh2R579RJn7 rrI+pcGUltUvm3fYEfGKs6LmfLUPVqL6IT84G/RBj84MdBc4KcoMVFAbL6SKgP1TZIoF a0yhHsOlmRKDVr6Lhdj+zy0zokem2K2WbBJrv32IsI7n3YB7qEU4NuXpzfmWXSb4ubsQ awsgL15c9rmnmaoSlrSWFc3nsOutzeHp44SSrtj3KUtyQssPDp8tXHxoKphHaFVM4mOH spsTs3fWVPuAEaq0MW8l1aTw+KKF/g7tY9CCgmCFCoQ3ERw4AEtNOnkmGUbPrdSY4YyG VkMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a26-20020a631a1a000000b00563f74f5ce5si3179120pga.372.2023.07.28.09.45.07; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230154AbjG1Qet (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:34:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232348AbjG1Qeq (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:34:46 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C10944B1 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888562F4; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.60] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.60]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 463D93F67D; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a2d824f-0035-7672-c441-88d143b4c73a@arm.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:34:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() Content-Language: en-GB To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com" , D Scott Phillips OS , "carl@os.amperecomputing.com" , "lcherian@marvell.com" , "bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com" , "xingxin.hx@openanolis.org" , "baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" , Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , "peternewman@google.com" , "dfustini@baylibre.com" References: <20230525180209.19497-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20230525180209.19497-16-james.morse@arm.com> From: James Morse In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Shaopeng TAN, On 12/06/2023 06:39, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote: >> Depending on the number of monitors available, Arm's MPAM may need to >> allocate a monitor prior to reading the counter value. Allocating a contended >> resource may involve sleeping. >> >> add_rmid_to_limbo() calls resctrl_arch_rmid_read() for multiple domains, the >> allocation should be valid for all domains. >> >> __check_limbo() and mon_event_count() each make multiple calls to >> resctrl_arch_rmid_read(), to avoid extra work on contended systems, the >> allocation should be valid for multiple invocations of resctrl_arch_rmid_read(). >> >> Add arch hooks for this allocation, which need calling before >> resctrl_arch_rmid_read(). The allocated monitor is passed to >> resctrl_arch_rmid_read(), then freed again afterwards. The helper can be >> called on any CPU, and can sleep. >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c >> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c >> index fb33100e172b..6d140018358a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c >> @@ -331,9 +331,14 @@ void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free) >> u32 idx_limit = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(); >> struct rmid_entry *entry; >> u32 idx, cur_idx = 1; >> + void *arch_mon_ctx; >> bool rmid_dirty; >> u64 val = 0; >> >> + arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(r, >> QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID); >> + if (arch_mon_ctx < 0) >> + return; >> + > > Would it be better to use IS_ERR() macro? Yup, much more readable! Thanks, James