Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp1673594rwb; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:04:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHaloyi7/LcCzCknSnsRQOx9hwW/6NEPyQbOlJ7Rb0Z4JEgGLgNDdskaD+WOVXsDlWUCpav X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3c8f:b0:132:8620:8d21 with SMTP id b15-20020a056a203c8f00b0013286208d21mr3772962pzj.58.1690574647718; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690574647; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yDPLM8crIfqzYd6npE3KxL5Ik933EGE/V7p6d8khUPoOlxbCP1N6Qmnh7ipdbr/rpC AL2lnu692Yl7v/30sy1LwOO0sNxZ4wuAnIy+VpHvTVjv9qOJy0pU4UxPifMVhigJkS6l z1U29GU0vZj3vFw45rq4nWF/N/SiBJItPWNItedCp9TV5QykU3xmcGOSrg6YNLzhCTt+ hGy95YCoQdU7RJBd4rCHnSd9mWae7ffYABMoMFzUmCtiSWsGzvrZMpqD1+erszbI+y5e 7U4H7xB61fXU38wZ7lLcZ4Fe0/+bS6JwQv0+/mgQfXogej+NKLgZyJoYx0MczyWtEZXX 5Nug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7jaQjO7CLZdGzdf6uXg2c2efFSO9SgBo0VteXJk2I4A=; fh=4rR1H8kv+4vCbjiH00qK71x3g7ud7q144X00w77KU1I=; b=zJeYZcdjPvoab1yshfuapcR5SGROF+q8VWe2rXGAUqDPLlAUYfOlhM9IUGkDrGDhiA zaQlqTZ/6R0pCbpnE5WjIYMgQqqwcurTBJQYta4A1wG1Up9uyg/Ne3/Op+WiAnneCK2G EF9r5SicjWzF6VJxP+T1AcXyZXwDkWEpwbwMaflk6fyRrGvctTgFSIdHc1zAKGYZbNjA W8uvXpW6qa2dpriNX/wK7gHOmY/0xsmWwqcaxMhA2KGVJ8slWZ91Wj59z2ql/QxcAuoX He9GOm3gpb9l7ziUyZMOB/E7ZsjpZascNwNg1ymI/p6+6Fr2Keri+eEFou5DssZGPdsx rPBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=cHnT1n7Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s20-20020a632c14000000b0055c96379d00si1825233pgs.710.2023.07.28.13.03.54; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=cHnT1n7Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233439AbjG1RZ6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:25:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53278 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233271AbjG1RZz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:25:55 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB323A9C; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690565152; x=1722101152; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mKRS6boUyUY8eyb/hoH/4uJAOZeecmb/FL8JIFuPo/w=; b=cHnT1n7Z5oAnnGakpk4VzsVk0T9CJJBoZMXlpC0x6ltPZREPwQtx/dOv PdswNw56QjQX9Dx1uXgTdJ6i2Pbio6qdyfUMnPzXzl1usYjKpxFHvkE7l tv1pYfU2cXFEadWniP/eF87amwR/yRQsd3xkZFLEMxj8nul13riJ7Yja6 HkqtNb5JP3Tz1+KBfP1dALgGPMge8y8t/ctCCpyLBR2SFOp3FGUNdPhaQ 7QM/jAbWrPwpQXiZY9K42CcP1weVFt/6ZE84JMSIoGF8pW5oE6yIJ75Zp 8aWfGQqITInMKW60IFq3qTlkUk8fM9pzHTdNdZrioO+taT9vVuPHDFU3h Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10784"; a="434931072" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,238,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="434931072" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jul 2023 10:25:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10784"; a="727556285" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,238,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="727556285" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 953e8cd98f7d) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2023 10:25:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 953e8cd98f7d with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qPRDh-0003Qb-2T; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:25:43 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 01:24:55 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Janusz Krzysztofik , Brendan Higgins , David Gow Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering Message-ID: <202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Janusz, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/kunit-fixes] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3] [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/kunit next-20230728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janusz-Krzysztofik/kunit-Report-the-count-of-test-suites-in-a-module/20230728-234736 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik%40linux.intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: declaration of 'struct suite_set' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:25: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:52: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:230: lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 46 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:97:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 97 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:138:4: warning: cast from 'void (*)(const void *)' to 'kunit_action_t *' (aka 'void (*)(void *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 138 | (kunit_action_t *)kfree, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings and 9 errors generated. vim +182 lib/kunit/executor.c 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 181 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @182 static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 183 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 184 struct kunit_suite * const *suites; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 185 struct kunit_case *test_case; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 186 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 187 /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 188 pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 189 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 190 for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 191 kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 192 pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 193 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 194 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 195 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki