Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754891AbXJ2T4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:56:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752196AbXJ2T4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:56:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35270 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752173AbXJ2T4F (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:56:05 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: 2.6.23 boot failures on x86-64. Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:56:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Linux Kernel , Martin Ebourne , Zou Nan hai , Suresh Siddha , stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds References: <20071029175014.GH7793@redhat.com> <200710292003.09317.ak@suse.de> <20071029194311.GE1650@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20071029194311.GE1650@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710292056.01086.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1221 Lines: 28 On Monday 29 October 2007 20:43:11 Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:03:09PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > It's probably the usual "nobody tests sparsemem at all" issue. > > > > > > We've been using SPARSEMEM in Fedora for a *long* time. > > > So long in fact, I forget why we moved away from DISCONTIGMEM, so there's > > > a significant number of users using that configuration for some time. > > > > Supposedly you wanted a slower kernel that needs more memory? > > > > Ok I wasn't aware of that. I tended to get sparsemem reports usually > > at least 1-2 releases after the fact, so it looked like it was undertested. > > Looking at cvs history, I can't figure out what the reasoning was, > but every Fedora (and RHEL5) kernel since 2006/07/05 has been that way. > > Curious how no-one noticed either of the side-effects you mention. It's a few percent on a few benchmarks iirc. vmemmap (now in .24) was supposed to address that. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/