Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:33:12 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc:     =?utf-8?B?5a2Z5YaJ?= <sunran001@208suo.com>,
        airlied <airlied@gmail.com>, daniel <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        "alexander.deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        amd-gfx <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of
 'unsigned'
Message-ID: <20230729193312.GA2844869@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
References: <3a4bebc5-79fb-4799-8743-14a0dde97a4f.sunran001@208suo.com>
 <ZMUeNehNb52Qu/Cp@debian.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZMUeNehNb52Qu/Cp@debian.me>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 09:12:05PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:35:19PM +0800, 孙冉 wrote:
> > WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@208suo.com>
> 
> Your From: address != SoB identity

While the comment below is a completely valid complaint, I think this
comment is being rather pedantic. Google Translate will tell you that
孙冉 is Sun Ran, so while the name does not strictly match, it is
clearly the same...

> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > index 39cc87a59a9a..9b55a7103cfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >   *
> >   * Returns corresponding domain of the ttm mem_type
> >   */
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_mem_type_to_domain(u32 mem_type)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_mem_type_to_domain(u32 mem_type)
> >  {
> >   switch (mem_type) {
> >   case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> > @@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >   return bo->tbo.base.size;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_bo_ngpu_pages(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_bo_ngpu_pages(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >  {
> >   return bo->tbo.base.size / RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline unsigned radeon_bo_gpu_page_alignment(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> > +static inline unsigned int radeon_bo_gpu_page_alignment(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> >  {
> >   return (bo->tbo.page_alignment << PAGE_SHIFT) / RADEON_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline void *radeon_sa_bo_cpu_addr(struct drm_suballoc *sa_bo)
> >  
> >  extern int radeon_sa_bo_manager_init(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> >           struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager,
> > -         unsigned size, u32 align, u32 domain,
> > +         unsigned int size, u32 align, u32 domain,
> >           u32 flags);
> >  extern void radeon_sa_bo_manager_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> >            struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager);
> 
> The patch is whitespace-corrupted. Use git-send-email(1) to submit patches.
> Also, your patch is also MIME-encoded, hence the corruption.
> 
> To Alex: Please don't apply this patch due to reasons above.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara