Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp3531211rwb; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 09:33:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGUMuE9nr4e05nc31qRSR8L825sj624iZ8W33tozhu2b8zO6uJRNODpBK09qdECbUSV2QOo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1902:b0:682:5634:3df1 with SMTP id y2-20020a056a00190200b0068256343df1mr9019029pfi.10.1690734829107; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 09:33:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690734829; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mqEoH73bcl18+1iZMRFEz1vvT0g32+SsMW6zeNf5yxRgA33gHqKmvUWRwqYA4j7zIh Q/RztTNgYH3AyDapV4N9dTh/wr47kJcDqxiyVlpFHr8mCawCPtiXt/DnS18/DUgrD/Cs /oddCwstUubyL0fyypCU8a0U5p9pZcQyNziKK5d7Th6dEnTojYAP5fsygS5EkZ3jXCXb Q5dSZAoh9KD70LQ47QGHOKb3NL7pefZL7BMeGwMcYNombsS3qv21yeuZAz8Adkpf2TaY Spnb39U3NIf8FPeurUx+jp9KaIQfKhOXKMIX2ecAnZglveU8/HQisEv95OT6ZpptpIxc hDPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=pGpaKgbhKo2RDvuvSYGg2z6Sh5xnNHpbY+dfdEHfHPM=; fh=U7D1EnUrZAndAONa0GhIMr2+z4O8mADYmvoHwcQYXEM=; b=K59aiTXpYT/v4mqfhQ6yekTCXm2BiE9whvd1+9sZOVNKSsBYDuJQB4RZVMdMjrdKxy ZK6AAHidojBaBjncdZq2wuYHgpVJIuAN7NoYnWGZPOC6brXYO5rEs8vi50lA8ZXI3dl+ oYcZuekNS0Uiimxm1OuSVmYyuXj9dgR5hO8e84lke1NC4im+8hq4/tb+KtfdZIasgpyr 7CcOqN3WZ+ycaymhNSLuPXOaMdxMfvD6tuV4EdNlbUHt4YlAp5CIBMU6kUPkHf/AGD2z bLCz9IIfM8zZIAI9NTBK4w87yliyn9yUa2P6FLIaverhm3NiyXaW8TgVObG08EKykhm6 L4Ug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tSXTirDF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8-20020a056a001a8800b0064d28b68d8fsi6160674pfv.94.2023.07.30.09.33.35; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 09:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tSXTirDF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230004AbjG3PJR (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:09:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229520AbjG3PJP (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:09:15 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6697CD; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D59360C8F; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 15:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D1FCC433C8; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 15:09:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690729752; bh=i6Um7zwUZZ/IUCCNWHWQm1K0RmCrv6YoXL840drPBtA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tSXTirDFqcdHZajDAdeX7GgivtbJKzcJP5uxaNpQ+w/VjAWOfWX+i1vrV3DogWOzn jORLxUbv02r/Pi2n2b2KdXTclN1vOTq0uS7ww11tObMCillIzytcYht19AxNl5WQoP npfpLOgugUwd6BkZnX0FcQ0maRffqzwzWUGoqd1TMDnQmJscVlSdi7oddYcHv3vlas 4VMzslRoC6CalNO9Vq6nvQDILfjgsEc3vaarMlQmfbz4DnOX39U/AKhddSWzQPJNll uBDPhE2cXZSOoO41gtoKr1i1q4W19zBOjiABB8QxLLh9lXbQCkbwp+4fjI7pmHJ0h/ Nkqs0KM1XvyRg== Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 22:57:32 +0800 From: Jisheng Zhang To: Prabhakar Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Guo Ren , Andrew Jones , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Samuel Holland , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: nonstandard cache operations support Message-ID: References: <20230702203429.237615-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20230702203429.237615-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230702203429.237615-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar > > Introduce support for nonstandard noncoherent systems in the RISC-V > architecture. It enables function pointer support to handle cache > management in such systems. > > This patch adds a new configuration option called > "RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS." This option is a boolean flag that > depends on "RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT" and enables the function pointer > support for cache management in nonstandard noncoherent systems. > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > Tested-by: Conor Dooley # tyre-kicking on a d1 > --- > v9 -> v10 > * Added __ro_after_init compiler attribute for noncoherent_cache_ops > * Renamed clean -> wback > * Renamed inval -> inv > * Renamed flush -> wback_inv > > v8 -> v9 > * New patch > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 7 ++++ > arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h | 28 +++++++++++++++ > arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c | 13 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index d9e451ac862a..42c86b13c5e1 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -265,6 +265,13 @@ config RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT > select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE > select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP > > +config RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + bool > + depends on RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT > + help > + This enables function pointer support for non-standard noncoherent > + systems to handle cache management. Per Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst: "we'll only consider patches for extensions that either: - Have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation, or - Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard Linux practice." I'm not sure which item this patch series belongs to. > + > config AS_HAS_INSN > def_bool $(as-instr,.insn r 51$(comma) 0$(comma) 0$(comma) t0$(comma) t0$(comma) zero) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..969cf1f1363a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Renesas Electronics Corp. > + */ > + > +#ifndef __ASM_DMA_NONCOHERENT_H > +#define __ASM_DMA_NONCOHERENT_H > + > +#include > + > +/* > + * struct riscv_cache_ops - Structure for CMO function pointers can we reword this line as "struct riscv_nonstd_cache_ops - Structure for non-standard CMO function pointers" to explictly note this is only for non-standard CMO. > + * > + * @wback: Function pointer for cache writeback > + * @inv: Function pointer for invalidating cache > + * @wback_inv: Function pointer for flushing the cache (writeback + invalidating) > + */ > +struct riscv_cache_ops { > + void (*wback)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size); > + void (*inv)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size); > + void (*wback_inv)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size); > +}; > + > +extern struct riscv_cache_ops noncoherent_cache_ops; > + > +void riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops(const struct riscv_cache_ops *ops); > + > +#endif /* __ASM_DMA_NONCOHERENT_H */ > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > index b9a9f57e02be..4c2e3f1cdfe6 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c > @@ -9,13 +9,26 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > static bool noncoherent_supported; > > +struct riscv_cache_ops noncoherent_cache_ops __ro_after_init = { > + .wback = NULL, > + .inv = NULL, > + .wback_inv = NULL, > +}; > + > static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) > { > void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(paddr); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.wback)) { I'm worried about the performance impact here. For unified kernel Image reason, RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS will be enabled by default, so standard CMO and T-HEAD's CMO platform's performance will be impacted, because even an unlikely is put here, the check action still needs to be done. > + noncoherent_cache_ops.wback(paddr, size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > > @@ -23,6 +36,13 @@ static inline void arch_dma_cache_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) > { > void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(paddr); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.inv)) { > + noncoherent_cache_ops.inv(paddr, size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > + > ALT_CMO_OP(inval, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > > @@ -30,6 +50,13 @@ static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size) > { > void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(paddr); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.wback_inv)) { > + noncoherent_cache_ops.wback_inv(paddr, size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > + > ALT_CMO_OP(flush, vaddr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > > @@ -50,6 +77,13 @@ void arch_dma_prep_coherent(struct page *page, size_t size) > { > void *flush_addr = page_address(page); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.wback_inv)) { > + noncoherent_cache_ops.wback_inv(page_to_phys(page), size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > + > ALT_CMO_OP(flush, flush_addr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > > @@ -75,3 +109,12 @@ void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void) > "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n"); > noncoherent_supported = true; > } > + > +void riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops(const struct riscv_cache_ops *ops) > +{ > + if (!ops) > + return; > + > + noncoherent_cache_ops = *ops; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops); > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c b/arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c > index 089df92ae876..c5fc5ec96f6d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c > @@ -7,15 +7,28 @@ > #include > > #include > +#include > > void arch_wb_cache_pmem(void *addr, size_t size) > { > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.wback)) { > + noncoherent_cache_ops.wback(virt_to_phys(addr), size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > ALT_CMO_OP(clean, addr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_wb_cache_pmem); > > void arch_invalidate_pmem(void *addr, size_t size) > { > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS > + if (unlikely(noncoherent_cache_ops.inv)) { > + noncoherent_cache_ops.inv(virt_to_phys(addr), size); > + return; > + } > +#endif > ALT_CMO_OP(inval, addr, size, riscv_cbom_block_size); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_invalidate_pmem); > -- > 2.34.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv