Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <15913bee637e2cff63626dc64c0577abc1ad9c6c.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] cxl/region: Remove else after return statement
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
        Raghu Halharvi <raghuhack78@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, ira.weiny@intel.com,
        bwidawsk@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        vishal.l.verma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:09:26 -0700
In-Reply-To: <ZMXIi+HC3uFQyvGK@aschofie-mobl2>
References: <20230726073421.2452-1-raghuhack78@gmail.com>
         <20230726073421.2452-3-raghuhack78@gmail.com>
         <ZMXIi+HC3uFQyvGK@aschofie-mobl2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 2023-07-29 at 19:18 -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:34:21AM +0000, Raghu Halharvi wrote:
> > Issue found with checkpatch
> > 
> > The else section here is redundant after return statement, removing it.
> > Sanity and correctness is not affected due to this fix.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raghu Halharvi <raghuhack78@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> 
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > index e115ba382e04..bfd3b13dd2c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > @@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ static int cxl_region_invalidate_memregion(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> >  				&cxlr->dev,
> >  				"Bypassing cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() for testing!\n");
> >  			return 0;
> > -		} else {
> > -			dev_err(&cxlr->dev,
> > -				"Failed to synchronize CPU cache state\n");
> > -			return -ENXIO;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		dev_err(&cxlr->dev,
> > +			"Failed to synchronize CPU cache state\n");
> > +		return -ENXIO;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(IORES_DESC_CXL);
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> > 

My preference would be for this function to be something like:
---
static int cxl_region_invalidate_memregion(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
{
	if (cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion()) {
		cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(IORES_DESC_CXL);
		return 0;
	}

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CXL_REGION_INVALIDATION_TEST)) {
		dev_warn_once(&cxlr->dev,
			      "Bypassing cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() for testing!\n");
		return 0;
	}

	dev_err(&cxlr->dev, "Failed to synchronize CPU cache state\n");
	return -ENXIO;
}