Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:55:07 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc:     bryantan@vmware.com, vdasa@vmware.com, pv-drivers@vmware.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vsock: Remove unused function declarations
Message-ID: <ftvs2ivhynszqi3ib3w4uccfx5ren5dgkjagoeuyasbjdd76ac@4rbyljp2xnof>
References: <20230729122036.32988-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230729122036.32988-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 08:20:36PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>These are never implemented since introduction in
>commit d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
>
>Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Good catch ;-)

I'd used "vsock/vmci:" as a prefix in the title.

With or without:

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
>index b7b072194282..dbda3ababa14 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
>@@ -116,9 +116,6 @@ struct vmci_transport {
> 	spinlock_t lock; /* protects sk. */
> };
>
>-int vmci_transport_register(void);
>-void vmci_transport_unregister(void);
>-
> int vmci_transport_send_wrote_bh(struct sockaddr_vm *dst,
> 				 struct sockaddr_vm *src);
> int vmci_transport_send_read_bh(struct sockaddr_vm *dst,
>-- 
>2.34.1
>
>