DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ainbz2wp0JDYeZpvV0mmTRdClpb8Q4tOxnFINkEaTxmuMNV8AaGfhF95/+pFvQfC55w/Fx6QSomajzIv87xRVVPYrdhqw3/hEsHLuFnkzB20HxPiO2+peUDa17s/FMRJvc+ttkoWOIW4J7pLQ+feMKKQiTKirIBW+RI+I3942zg=
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:54:54 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
To: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Cc: Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bootup support for watchdog with short timeout
 (touch_nmi_watchdog()?)
Message-ID: <20071029215454.0d644ca7@vader.jdub.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071029194503.GB27646@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <200710291522.27311.stefan.roese@gmail.com>
	<20071029194503.GB27646@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1512
Lines: 32

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:45:03 -0400
lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:22:27PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > I'm trying to implement support for a board specific watchdog on a PPC440EPx 
> > board with a very short timeout. In this case, the watchdog has to 
> > be "kicked" at least every 100ms, even while booting and the real watchdog 
> > driver not running yet. While looking for trigger places in the kernel 
> > source, I noticed the already existing "touch_nmi_watchdog()" function, which 
> > seems to be doing what I need. Even if the name not exactly matches my 
> > hardware setup.
> > 
> > My question now is, is it recommended to use this 
> > touch_nmi_watchdog() "infrastructure" for my PPC custom specific watchdog 
> > during bootup? And if yes, should it perhaps be renamed to a more generic 
> > name, like "touch_watchdog"?
> > 
> > Please advise. Thanks.
> 
> No idea really.  Who would design a watchdog with such a short trigger
> time?  That doesn't seem to be useful in any way.

To some degree, it's configurable.  But the generic question still
stands.  It seems like a decent idea to me.  Making touch_watchdog (or
whatever it winds up being called) nice across arches might be fun.

josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/