Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0713eab4-1cb0-dbb1-fc8d-f9cbaf566a0f@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:04:18 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 12/12] drm/gem: Add _unlocked postfix to
 drm_gem_pin/unpin()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>, Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@collabora.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
References: <20230722234746.205949-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
 <20230722234746.205949-13-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
 <20230725095303.07611834@collabora.com>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230725095303.07611834@collabora.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/25/23 10:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 02:47:46 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
> 
>> Make clear that drm_gem_pin/unpin() functions take reservation lock by
>> adding _unlocked postfix to the function names.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> 
> I'm still a bit confused by the fact we sometimes use the
> xxx[_locked]() pattern (version without the _locked suffix takes the
> lock) and other times the xxx[_unlocked]() pattern (version with the
> _unlocked suffix takes the lock). It'd be good to chose one pattern and
> stick to it, at least for all core functions...

After a more close look, agree that the _locked variant is much more
common in DRM. Alright, I'll rename the drm-gem funcs.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry